Residents, research link farms to illness
DELTA, Pa. - Mark and Diane Thomas were accustomed to farm life when they moved from Maryland into a charming 1830s log home here on 19 acres.
But in the two years since then -- as Diane suffered headaches and a persistent skin infection, and her husband and two children struggled with diarrhea and other digestive problems -- they began to suspect their health problems were caused by the hog farm next door. And they grew further alarmed when the farm earlier this year announced plans to expand from 450 pigs to 4,400.
At a public hearing tonight, the Thomases and other opponents of the expansion intend to call a public health scientist to testify on their behalf.
The zoning battle just across the Maryland state line is one of a growing number of challenges across the country linking human illness to industrial-style farm operations. Although such battles have long hinged on water pollution from animal waste, researchers cite mounting evidence, including recent studies by the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins University, that pig and chicken farms can produce drug-resistant bacteria when animals regularly get antibiotics.
Spread by fans from large feeding buildings, these supergerms can escape into the air, as well as to streams and underground drinking water supplies, potentially threatening the health of neighbors, according to the Maryland studies.
"I have no problem with farmers, farming or the smell of farms," said Mark Thomas, 45, a major in the Maryland Air National Guard who grew up on farms. "But it doesn't seem fair to me to put everybody else's health at risk."
The National Pork Producers Council, a trade group, acknowledges that farmers nationwide routinely put antibiotics in their hogs' feed to keep them healthy and help them grow, but it asserts that the practice is harmless.
David Gemmill, who owns the 300-acre hog farm next to the Thomases and whose family has raised livestock on the land for five generations, said his farm does not pollute, and his animals receive antibiotics only when ill. So he said it's impossible that his pigs are making anyone sick.
"People get sick every day from something don't bring that back to the farmer," said Gemmill, 54.
If the expansion is approved, he said his family hopes to sign a contract with Hershey Ag, of Marietta, Pa., which would own the hogs and choose their feed. The company says its practice regarding antibiotics is limited. Young pigs receive the drugs only in their first four weeks, and older pigs receive them only if sick, according to company owner, Brent Hershey.
"We do not utilize antibiotics on a routine basis," he said.
Regardless how the local debate is resolved, researchers say that people who live near hog farms might have good reason to worry about their health. The recent studies raise new questions about farms referred to as CAFOS, or "concentrated animal feeding operations," which raise large numbers of animals in buildings.
University of Maryland microbiologist Amy Sapkota co-authored studies published in July 2007 and February 2005, both documenting antibiotic resistant bacteria escaping from an unidentified Mid-Atlantic hog operation.
In one study, 98 percent of 124 bacteria samples collected from air inside a CAFO contained antibiotic resistant bacteria. In another, she found that streams and underground water supplies downhill from the farm had high levels of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, including e-coli and fecal coliform. The movement of resistant bacteria from swine CAFOs into the environment "can be extensive," her report concluded.
In addition, a 2000 University of North Carolina survey of 155 people found increased rates of headaches, diarrhea, runny noses, sore throats, coughing, digestive problems and breathing ailments among those who lived near CAFO hog farms.
"Neighbors of CAFOs across the country have reported similar symptoms," Sapkota said.
Opponents of the expansion in Pennsylvania have called Sapkota to testify at a zoning hearing on the plan tonight. Sapkota said township officials should prohibit more CAFOs because tests by the U.S. Geological Survey have shown underground drinking water supplies in the area have already been contaminated by animal waste from nearby farms.
"There should be a moratorium on new CAFOs in sensitive areas like this," Sapkota said. Her warnings are echoed by other scientists.
A study published in August by University of Illinois researchers in the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology, found that feeding the antibiotic tetracycline to hogs created drug-resistant genes that were passed like batons from one bacterial species to another, with the supergerms escaping into ground water.
Another report published by Canadian scientists in October linked routine use of antibiotics in hog feed to the spread of antibiotic-resistant staphylococcus bacteria among both pigs and farm workers. Research in the Netherlands in 2005 and 2006 also found the spread of antibiotic-resistant staph among hog farmers and pigs.
The problem might extend beyond pig farms. Half of 16 poultry workers recently examined in Maryland and Virginia were carrying antibiotic resistant e-coli bacteria, suggesting chicks receiving the drugs pose a disease threat, according to a study published yesterday by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Dr. Robert Lawrence, director of the Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, said antibiotic resistance is aggravated by living conditions in CAFOs, where bacteria spread easily with thousands of animals close together.
Antibiotics' overuse on farms parallels the overuse of the drugs in hospitals that is suspected in recent outbreaks of MRSA (Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) across the country, he said. The big danger is that antibiotics will stop working, he said.
"We are taking a precious medical miracle of the 20th century, the discovery of antibiotics, and we are destroying it by inappropriate use in animal feed on factory farms," said Lawrence.
The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that farm animals every year are fed about 13 million pounds of antibiotic varieties also used by humans. That's more than four times the amount doctors prescribe for patients. Among the biggest users of the drugs are hog farms, 67,300 of which are in the U.S.
Dave Warner, spokesman for the National Pork Producers Council, said banning the routine use of antiobics would mean more hogs get sick and die, raising the price of meat for consumers.
"All of my kids get shots for mumps, rubella and measles so they won't get sick and we do the same with pigs and antibiotics," Warner said."You can control disease outbreaks better when they're confined."
If the farm gets approval to expand, Gemmill's family will be able to build a large barn over a 120-foot-wide, 297 foot-long manure pit. Gemmill said the 1.7 million gallons of waste produced annually will be spread on their fields as fertilizer for corn, soybeans, wheat and hay.
The farm already uses hog waste to fertilize its crops. And Mark Thomas said he's worried not only about the affect on his family's health, but also water pollution. Already, the Thomases don't drink their tap water. He said tests paid for by the family show nitrate levels in the water supply have doubled to twice the federal limit over the past two years. One nearby stream is tainted with fecal bacteria, according to sampling by a consultant hired by the citizens group.
Thomas worries that waste from thousands of hogs could pollute waterways as far off as the Chesapeake Bay. "Maryland needs to know what's coming right downstream into their state and bay," he said.Baltimore Sun
