Industrial Fish Farming Reform

 

IATP's Industrial Fish Farming Reform Campaign works to end the most environmentally damaging practices of industrial aquaculture through regulation, standards, and consumer pressure campaigns. We are focusing primarily on salmon aquaculture for two reasons. First, because it is the fastest growing and the most environmentally damaging sector of industrial fish farming here in North America. Second, there are positive alternative products, like Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certified sustainable, and some organic Alaska wild salmon, as well as abundant Pacific salmon species, readily available for consumers, supermarkets, and chefs to purchase instead of imported farmed salmon.

 

Current Activities

 

Reforming Industrial Fish Farming

 

We will continue to expand our national campaign designed to end the most serious environmental impacts of factory fish farms. Over the next two years, we will focus on the following specific objectives:

 

·        Reduce the use of pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics, and other drugs now leading to widespread aquifer, coastal and surface water contamination.

·        Reduce the intentional killing of sea lions, seals and other marine mammals, and millions of cormorants and other birds exterminated to “protect” industrial fish.

·        Stop the introduction of untested genetically engineered (transgenic) salmon.

·        Reduce the level of environmental disruption from fish farms brought on by accidental introduction of exotic species.

·        Reduce the level of fish farm contamination from antibiotic-resistant bacteria, food coloring additives, heavy metals, pesticides, and other toxins.

·        Protect wild runs of salmon and other fish by reducing habitat loss, net-pen escapes and spread of disease and parasites from fish farms.

·        Protect world food supplies by reducing the use of harvested wild fish as food for industrial fish farms.

·        Reduce the competitive advantage of industrial aquaculture that results from their ability to "externalize" and therefore not pay for any of these environmental costs.

·        Protect the environmental and social integrity of rural communities.

 

We will establish benchmarks and specific evaluation criteria for measuring our progress.

 

We will rely on four major strategies to achieve these specific objectives -- Increased regulation and enforcement, adoption of voluntary standards by producers, buyers, and sellers, organized consumer pressure through market campaigns, and direct assistance to help local communities protect themselves from industrial fish farming. IATP staff will engage in the following specific activities with each of these major strategic areas.

 

1.      Regulation and Enforcement

 

a)      Use of both "carrot and stick" activities to get government agencies to enforce existing laws and regulations related to fish farming, including water quality protection, food safety issues related to colorants and dyes, workplace safety, endangered species act, etc.

 

b)      Introduction of more sophisticated and comprehensive environmental laws and regulations at the local, county, state, and federal levels designed to achieve one or more campaign objectives. Our top focus will be on new laws to reduce contamination from toxic chemicals, heavy metals, antibiotics, and other pharmaceuticals.

 

c)      Convince policymakers and industrial aquaculture companies to adopt a moratorium on the further expansion of industrial aquaculture until adequate environmental and social protection laws and regulations are in place and fully implemented.

 

2.      Voluntary Standards

 

a)      Work with major buyers, including at least one major restaurant chain, to develop and adopt purchasing/procurement guidelines that result in their increased purchasing of sustainably certified fish and marine products.

 

b)      Encourage the completion and adoption of standards for organic certification of fish products so that companies who meet very high standards can receive proper economic benefits from their good performance in the marketplace.

 

c)      Encourage state-level aquaculture associations to adopt rigorous ethical, environmental, and social standards as a basis for membership.

 

3.      Consumer Pressure

 

a)      Expanding of our public education campaign aimed at informing consumers and the general public about the environmental dangers of industrial fish farming.

 

b)      Organizing local committees dedicated to talking with grocers, fish market owners, and chefs to encourage them to choose wild over farmed fish.

 

c)      Securing the active support and participation by major membership organizations that agree to urge their members to buy sustainably harvested wild fish instead of farmed fish. Our goal is to have endorsements from membership groups representing 10 million members and to have 10,000 of their members (10,000) actively engaged.

 

d)      Increased national media outreach to raise the level of newspaper, radio, and television coverage of this issue and to educate reporters about the important environmental and health issues at stake.

 

4.      Assisting Rural Communities

 

In the United States, industrial aquaculture is often promoted to rural communities as a way to create employment and to expand the local tax base.  Unfortunately, these promises of new jobs, enhanced community income, and a better quality of life fail to materialize.  In addition, the siting of large industrial aquaculture facilities can lead to significant environment, social, and health concerns including the escape of exotic species, water pollution, and unsafe chemical use.  Another problem is absentee ownership, which can both drain money from the community and lead to the abandonment of facilities without concern for the community impacts or for the mess that is being left behind. Like similar “smokestack chasing” development schemes, industrial aquaculture is not a viable way to enhance local community development.

 

IATP's hot line (1-877-565-1287) for technical assistance was opened near the end of 2001 and is now ready for full-scale publicity and promotion throughout the United States. We will be mounting a marketing and promotion campaign targeted in the "hot zones" where industrial fish feedlots are the most likely to be locating or creating problems for local residents. We will expand out team of experts ready to help local communities threatened with the introduction of industrial fish feedlots to protect their communities.