Press Release from the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
June 16, 2003
For Immediate Release:
Contact: Kristin Dawkins, 612-870-3410, kdawkins@iatp.org
Ben Lilliston, 301-270-4787, blilliston@iatp.org
IATP Applauds International Ratification of UN Biosafety Treaty
Treaty Reaffirms Rights of Nations To Set GMO Regulations
Minneapolis - Late last week, the Pacific nation of Palau became the 50th country to sign the United Nation's Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The signature triggers a 90-day countdown, with the treaty coming into force on September 11, 2003.
The Biosafety Protocol, which follows the precautionary principle and empowers nation's to regulate GMO foods, could run into direct conflict with how another international institution, the World Trade Organization, handles GMOs. Last month, the U.S. filed a legal challenge before the WTO contesting Europe's right to place a moratorium on some GMO food crops. The Biosafety Protocol reaffirms the right of Europe, and other countries, to set their own regulations for biotech crops.
"We applaud the nations of the world who have signed on to this ground-breaking treaty," said Kristin Dawkins, Vice President for Global Programs at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. "The precautionary approach taken by this treaty will help participating countries to utilize appropriate labeling requirements as well as environmental and health safeguards when addressing GMO foods."
"It is a shame that throughout eight years of these negotiations, the U.S. repeatedly attempted to weaken and water-down this treaty," said Dawkins. "Instead of working through the UN to set an international floor of minimum standards that must be met around the world, the U.S. is pushing for a ceiling at the WTO, which would restrict nations from setting more rigorous safety standards."
The treaty is the first legally binding international agreement governing the movement of living modified organisms (LMOs), including genetically modified foods, across national borders. The Protocol, agreed to by 131 countries in Montreal in 2000, establishes the rights of national governments to regulate all GMOs, while developing countries may use the Protocol to regulate commodities even before national policies are in place. Environmental, human health and socio-economic factors are recognized as valid considerations in determining whether to accept or reject GMO imports.
The passage of the Biosafety Protocol could have a major impact on U.S. exports to nation's participating in the treaty. Although the U.S. is not a party to the treaty, participating nations can still enforce the treaty when handling imports from non-participating countries.
"This treaty will likely require all U.S. shipments to participating countries of certain crops that have GMO varieties, like corn and soybeans, to be labeled as `may contain' GMOs," said Dawkins. "It also give those nation's the right to reject that shipment if those GMOs have not been approved in that country. We do not currently have an effective segregation system here in the U.S. between GMO and non-GMO - so it is unclear how this new treaty will be implemented by U.S. shippers and importing countries."
On September 11, 2003, certain provisions of the Treaty will take effect immediately:
Following the agreement's entry into force, the decision-making body of all the member countries of the Protocol, - the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties - will convene to address topics related to the operation and implementation of the Protocol. The first meeting is scheduled for the first quarter of 2004 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy promotes resilient family farms, rural communities and ecosystems around the world through research and education, science and technology, and advocacy.
##